CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----30571 30571 30571 30571 168 168 168 168 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Sunita Devi State of Haryana Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: Present Present Present Present: SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL 2. would be satisfied, consider and take a conscious decision on 12.05.2026 ( 3. Priyanka Sadar Thakur, Senior DAG Haryana of respondents No.1 to 3 30571 30571 30571 30571----2026 2026 2026 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----30571 30571 30571 30571----2026 2026 2026 2026 Sunita Devi versus Haryana and others Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: Date of decision: May 29 May 29 May 29 May 29, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: Date of Uploading: May 29 May 29 May 29 May 29, , , , 2026 2026 2026 2026 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Mr. Mahesh Inder Preet, Advocate for Mr. Jarnail Singh Saneta, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL SUMEET GOEL, J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) , J. (ORAL) The substantive prayer made in the petition in hand reads thus: ““““It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this allowed and the appropriate direction respondent No.4 not to interfere in petitioner bearing registration HR-45 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in RCR Criminal 2007(2) page 76 titled as "ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs Parkash Kaur and others" and Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme C in SLP (Crl.) No. 4935 of 2006 decided on 15.5.2008 in case titled as "ICICI Bank Vs. Shanti Devi Sharma & Ors", keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case; in the interest of justice. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that would be satisfied, in case a direction is issued to consider and take a conscious decision on (Annexure P-3) made by the petitioner. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, Priyanka Sadar Thakur, Senior DAG Haryana of respondents No.1 to 3 and submits that grievance of the petitioner will be 1111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH CHANDIGARH 2026 2026 2026 2026 ....Petitioner ....Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL r. Mahesh Inder Preet, Advocate for Advocate for the petitioner. substantive prayer made in the petition in hand reads thus: It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this petition may kindly be allowed and the appropriate direction may kindly be issued to the the free plying of the vehicle of the 45-D-6473 in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in RCR Criminal 2007(2) page 76 titled as "ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs Parkash Kaur and others" and Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India reported in SLP (Crl.) No. 4935 of 2006 decided on 15.5.2008 in case titled as "ICICI Bank Vs. Shanti Devi Sharma & Ors", keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case; in the interest of justice.”””” Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner a direction is issued to the concerned authority to consider and take a conscious decision on the representation dated made by the petitioner. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, Ms. Priyanka Sadar Thakur, Senior DAG Haryana causes appearance on behalf that grievance of the petitioner will be MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.05.29 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CRM CRM CRM CRM----M M M M----30571 30571 30571 30571----2026 2026 2026 2026 2222 looked into by the concerned authority, i.e., Superintendent of Police, Karnal (respondent No.2) and it shall take decision either way, on the representation dated 12.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner. 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition in hand is disposed of disposed of disposed of disposed of with a direction to the concerned authority, i.e., Superintendent of Police, Karnal (respondent No.2) to consider representation dated 12.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner and take a ratiocinated decision thereupon, in accordance with law, within a period of 02 weeks from the date of receipt/ production of certified copy of this order and the same be communicated to the petitioner thereafter. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE May 29 May 29 May 29 May 29, 2026 , 2026 , 2026 , 2026 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2026.05.29 17:16 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment