[2026:RJ-JP:16389] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5925/2026 Sappi S/o Israel, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Uttawara Police Station Uttawar District Palwal Haryana. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Liyakat Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 18/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.37/2017 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 353, 307 of IPC, 1860 and Section 5 of the Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration of Export) Act, 1995 and Sections 16, 54 of Excise Act, 1950. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that in the present case the FIR was lodged in the year 2017 however, the petitioner was not present at the spot and was unaware of any criminal proceedings pending against him. It is contends that when he came to know about the said proceedings, he [2026:RJ-JP:16389] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5925/2026] surrendered before the learned Trial Court on 02.03.2026. It is further submitted that from the year 2017 to 2026, no criminal case has been reported against him. It is submitted that the matter is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. Petitioner is behind the bars since 02.03.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioner. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sappi S/o Israel, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/13