HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7/2026 1. Monu S/o Shri Aslam, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Gali No. 13, L. Ahmad Nagar, P.S. Lohiya Nagar, District Meerut (UP) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). 2. Sameer S/o Shri Aslam, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Gali No. 13, L. Ahmad Nagar, P.S. Lohiya Nagar, District Meerut (UP) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.8/2026 Shahrukh S/o Shri Faiyyaj, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 100 Foota Suhail Garden, Near Milan Palace, P.S. Lisadi Gate, District Meerut (UP) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Rajat Singh, Adv. Mr. Sachin Kumar Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Man Singh Meena, Adv. Ms. Jaya, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 07/01/2026 1. The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7/2026] accused-petitioners. The accused-petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.238/2025, registered at Police Station Malpura Gate, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2), 319(2) and 316(2) of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further contended that the other similarly placed co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by this Court and by the Co-ordinate Bench. It is also contended that the accused- petitioners are in custody since 08.10.2025, charge-sheet has already been produced and further trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail applications of the accused- petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of the bail applications and contended that the petitioners are habitual offender and against them several other cases relating to the offence of Cyber fraud have been registered, therefore, their bail applications may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused material available on record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case, considering the fact that the petitioners are in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time and the other co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by this Court and by the Co-ordinate Bench, therefore, this Court deems it fit and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely; 1. Monu S/o Shri Aslam, (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7/2026] 2. Sameer S/o Shri Aslam and 3. Shahrukh S/o Shri Faiyyaj, in connection with FIR No.238/2025, registered at Police Station Malpura Gate, District Jaipur City (East), shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned S.H.O. before releasing the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. The accused-petitioners are also directed to mark their presence on 25th of every month before the concerned Police Station till conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioners and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioners on the same day to the concerned trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned S.H.O. for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-11-12