PRAKASH BABAN GAIKWAD AND ANR. v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
APEAL/1081/2024 · 2026-10-19
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21246 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21246 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
27-apeal-1081-1083-24.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1081 OF 2024 Prakash B. Gaikwad and Anr. …Appellants. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents. WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1083 OF 2024 Ganesh V. Jamdar & Ors. . …Appellants. V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents. ………….. Mr. Shekhar Jagtap i/by J. Shekhar Associates for the Appellants. Mr. P.H. Gaikwad, APP for the Respondent/State. Mr. Samay Pawar for Respondent No.2. PSI Rahul Bhagwat, Shirur Police Station is present. ………….. CORAM :
N.R. BORKAR, J.
DATE :
19.10.2026.
P.C. :
1. Learned APP for the respondent-State, on instructions, submits that the prosecution has filed A-Summary report in crime in question. In that view of the matter, nothing survives in the present appeals, which are filed against an order rejecting anticipatory bail application/s filed by the appellants. Accordingly, the Appeals are disposed of.
2. However, liberty is granted to the appellants to file fresh application for anticipatory bail in case A-Summary Report is not accepted.
[N.R.BORKAR, J.] Dinesh S. Sherla 1/1 DINESH SADANAND SHERLA Digitally signed by DINESH SADANAND SHERLA Date: 2026.10.19 17:34:29 +0530