DEEPAK GURJAR S/O RATI RAM GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/8446/2025 · 2026-01-28
Anil Kumar Upman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21243 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21243 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3961] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8446/2025 Deepak Gurjar S/o Rati Ram Gurjar, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 504, Dev Narayan Mandir, Kanak Ghati, Chomeriya, Brahmpuri, Tripolia Bazar, Jaipur. ----Accused-Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent
2. Mahesh Chand S/o Ramjilal, R/o Gogoriyan, Andhi, Jaipur Rural, Jaipur. ----Complainant-Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Beniwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP and Mr. Rajendra Singh, Adv., for complainant.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 28/01/2026
1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.129/2025 registered at Police Station Jamwa Ramgarh, District Jaipur Rural for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 308(2) and 352 of BNS, 2023, on the basis of compromise.
2. Parties are present in person. They have duly been identified by their respective counsel.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that parties have settled their dispute amicably. He further submits that though 21 cases were registered against the petitioner, but in 15 cases, he has been acquitted and presently six cases are pending against him and presently, the petitioner is leading peaceful life as law
[2026:RJ-JP:3961] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-8446/2025] abiding citizen and the present case is also result of money dispute. It is further submitted that due to compromise, further proceedings in the aforesaid FIR are fruitless. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition.
4.
Learned counsel for complainant submits that complainant has no objection if the present misc. petition is allowed.
5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for perusal; considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604] and as such, the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.
6. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.129/2025 registered at Police Station Jamwa Ramgarh, District Jaipur Rural is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.
7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN MEENA/S-392