Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010280422021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE No.1597 OF 2021 Between: Mathi Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Kutumba Rao, Aged 53 years, Occ. Cooli, R/o. H. No. 3-67, Modhumudi Village, Avanigadda (M), Krishna District. ...Petitioner
AND
1. Bhukya Srinu Nayak, The Tahsildar, Avanigadda, Krishna District.
2. Potarlanka Sai Babu, Village Revenue Officer, Modumudi Village,
Avanigadda Mandal, Krishna District. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Smt.Kalla Tulasi Durgamba Counsel for the Respondents: Mr.P.Subash
The Court made the following ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr.S.Satish, learned counsel representing the respondents.
2. The present contempt case is filed alleging violation of the interim orders dated 01.2.2021 passed in Writ Petition No.2473 of 2021. Vide the said orders, this Court directed the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner / demolish the subject matter property without issuing any notice or following due process of law.
3. In the affidavit filed in support of the Contempt Case, the petitioner states that the respondents gave warning to the effect that they will take
2
steps to demolish the structure, if the petitioner fails to vacate the same. Thus, there is neither dispossession of the petitioner nor demolition of his property, in the absence of which, it cannot be treated that the orders of this Court have been violated.
4. In that view of the matter, the Contempt Case is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA,J February 05, 2026 vasu