Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2124 (RAJ)

SMT. SUNITA W/O SHRI NAWAL SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3371/2026 · 2026-04-20

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:16570] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3371/2026 Smt. Sunita W/o Shri Nawal Singh, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Bajna Road, Kaneka Bajna, District Mathura (Uttar Pradesh). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 20/04/2026 1. Apprehending her arrest in connection with FIR No.224/2023 registered at Police Station-Sadar Deeg, District-Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 120-B, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 482 BNSS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that, as per the FIR itself, the allegation has been levelled against the son of the petitioner that he received Rs. 10 lakhs from the complainant on the pretext of securing employment. He argued that the petitioner is not involved in this case and no specific role has been attributed to her. She has been implicated only on the ground that the son of the petitioner had used the petitioner's bank account in receiving Rs. 2 lakhs from the [2026:RJ-JP:16570] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3371/2026] complainant. It is urged that the petitioner is a 57-year-old lady and is ready to join and cooperate in the investigation. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and allegations raised in FIR and that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the bail application of the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner-Smt. Sunita W/o Shri Nawal Singh, she shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and [2026:RJ-JP:16570] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3371/2026] (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg/41