[2026:RJ-JP:3050] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17076/2025 Brijmohan @ Mohan S/o Nauranglal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ishkpura, Police Station Singhana District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Khetri District Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 222/2026 1. Balwant Singh S/o Sher Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Dhana, Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 2. Abhishek S/o Leeladhar, aged about 21 Years, R/o Dhana, Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan (Both are at Present Lodge At Sub Jail Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 223/2026 1. Birjuram Mawar S/o Sundaram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Dhana, Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan 2. Sachin S/o Omprakash, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Gopi, Police Station Badhda, District Dadri, Haryana. (At Present Accused-Petitioners Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.1371/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:3050] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-17076/2025] Hansraj @ Hansa S/o Leelaram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ishakpura, Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Krishna Singh, Adv. and Mr. Naveen Kumar Khaparwal, Adv. for Mr. Raj Kumar Kasana, Adv. Mr. Sudhir Yadav, Adv. Ms. Aayushi Jain, Adv. Mr. S.K. Lamba, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishiraj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Anirudh Singh, Astt. Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 22/01/2026 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.320/2025, registered at Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu, for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 331(4), 351(2), 352 and 191(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused- petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the allegations against the accused-petitioners are not specific rather omnibus in nature. The injuries sustained to injured Pradeep Singh was opined to be simple blunt in nature and not dangerous to life. Similarly, the injuries sustained to injured Mahendra Singh Saini was found to be grievous in nature. It is [2026:RJ-JP:3050] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-17076/2025] further contended that except petitioner-Hansraj there are no criminal record pending against the other accused-petitioners. It is further contended that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long, the investigation against the petitioners have been concluded, petitioners Balwant Singh, Abhishek and Hansraj, have not been named in the FIR, therefore, their bail application of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail applications and contended that the petitioners along with the other co-accused assaulted injured Mahendra and Pradeep resulting into injury at the head of injured Mahendra, which was found to be grievous in nature. It is also contended that against the accused-petitioner-Hansraj two cases were registered under various offences, therefore, considering the nature of injuries sustained to injured Mahendra, their bail applications may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the nature of injuries sustained to injured and the fact that the petitioners are in custody since long and their presence is not required further in the investigation, the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, this Court deems it proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely; 1. Brijmohan @ Mohan S/o Nauranglal, 2. Balwant Singh S/o Sher Singh, 3. Abhishek S/o Leeladhar, 4. Birjuram Mawar S/o Sundaram, 5. Sachin S/o Omprakash [2026:RJ-JP:3050] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-17076/2025] and 6. Hansraj @ Hansa S/o Leelaram, in connection with FIR No.320/2025, registered at Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu, shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-petitioner-Hansraj @ Hansa S/o Leelaram is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month before the concerned Police Station till conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned trial Court every month without any delay. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-256-259