Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21239 (KAR)

SRI. G. RAMA MOHANA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

RP/150/2026 · 2026-06-12

D K Singh, S Rachaiah

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28629-DB RP No. 150 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH REVIEW PETITION NO.150 OF 2026 IN W.A NOS.417/2025 C/W 53/2025 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. G. RAMA MOHANA S/O LATE NARAYANA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT LADA HOUSE, MONTEPADAVU, MANJANADI VILLAGE, MANGALURU, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 153. (PETITIONER NO.1 IS NOT CLAIMING THE BENEFIT OF SENIOR CITIZEN) 2. SRI G.JAYAPRAKASH S/O LATE NARAYANA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT LADA HOUSE, MONTEPADAVU, MANJANADI VILLAGE, Digitally signed by SUSHMA LAKSHMI B S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28629-DB RP No. 150 of 2026 MANGALURU, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 153. 3. SRI G.A.ARAVINDA S/O LATE NARAYANA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT LADA HOUSE, MONTEPADAVU, MANJANADI VILLAGE, MANGALURU, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 153. 4. SRI G.N.VISHWESHWARA S/O LATE NARAYANA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT LADA HOUSE, MONTEPADAVU, MANJANADI VILLAGE, MANGALURU, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 153. (NOTE : PETITIONERS No.1 to 4 ARE RESPONDENTS IN W.A.No.417/2025) 5. SMT. SRIVIDHYA W/O LATE SATHYAGANAPATHI BHAT, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT PAMBATHAJE, KAROPADY VILLAGE, BANTWAL TALUK - 574 279. (NOTE : PETITIONER No.5 IS RESPONDENT IN W.A.No.53/2025) …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVARAMA BHAT O., ADVOCATE) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28629-DB RP No. 150 of 2026 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER D.K. MANGALORE - 575 001. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MANGALURU SUB-DIVISION, 2ND FLOOR, TALUK ADMINISTRATIVE SOUDHA, MANGALURU - 575 001. 4. THE TAHASILDAR MANGALURU TALUK, MANGALURU, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 219. (NOTE : RESPONDENTS No.1 to 4 ARE APPELLANTS IN W.A.No.417/2025) 5. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28629-DB RP No. 150 of 2026 6. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER D.K. MANGALORE - 575 001. 7. THE TAHASILDAR MANGALURU TALUK, MANGALURU, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 574 219. (NOTE : RESPONDENTS No.5 to 7 ARE APPELLANS IN W.A.No.53/2025) …RESPONDENTS ---- THIS REVIEW PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 114 R/W ORDER 47 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE COMMON JUDGMENT DATED 23.02.2026 PASSED BY THIS COURT IN WA NO.417/2025 CONNECTED WITH WA NO.53/2025 AND DISPOSE OF THE SAME, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28629-DB RP No. 150 of 2026 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) Heard. 2. There is no error apparent on the face of the record in the impugned judgment either on law or facts. Therefore, we dismiss the review petition. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE Bss List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1