[2026:RJ-JP:667] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 142/2026 1. Deepak Chandila S/o Gajraj Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Bandol 116 Faridabad HR. Owner Of Truck No. HR.38.AE.0598. 2. Manoj S/o Charan Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o B-38 Bhati Kala Badi Bhati Fatehpur Beri South Delhi- 74 T/add - Village Bhajnsrawali Faridabad HR. Owner Of Truck No. HR.38.U.9130. 3. M/s AV Construction, Through Prop. Vikash Choudhary S/o Pramod Choudhary Aged About 31 Year R/o Village Dhunela Sohna GGN P-Add Habib Pur Drajn Khera Chauganpur New Greater Noida GBN UP. Gurgaon HR. Owner Of Truck No HR.55.AF.9065. 4. Hemant S/o Ashok Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 12-B Dera Village Dera South Delhi T-Add- Pali Bash Pali Faridabad HR. Owner Of Truck No. HR.38.U.9302. 5. Rao Logistic, Through Prop. Sunil Yadav S/o Shri Pal Aged About 36 Year R/o U- 162 Dlf Phase - 3 Gurgaon HR. Owner Of Truck No. HR.55.AH.7345. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Regional Transport Office, Sikar. 3. Regional Transport Officer, Alwar. 4. District Transport Officer, Kotputali District Jaipur. 5. Regional Transport Office, Bharatpur. 6. Regional Transport Office, Ajmer. 7. Regional Transport Office, Jaipur First. 8. Regional Transport Office, Jaipur Second. ----Respondents [2026:RJ-JP:667] (2 of 3) [CW-142/2026] For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Jamasi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore, AAAG, Mr. Tanishq Aditya Parmar on behalf of Mr. S. S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 08/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for both the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present matter is squarely covered by the judgments passed by the Co-ordinate Benches of this Court in the matters of Kanwar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.1 and Mustak & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.2 2. In view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned / possessed by the petitioners were suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the petitioners were not afforded the opportunity of hearing and that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their family. 3. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to the condition that the petitioners will produce their vehicles before the Transport Department, who will examine and inspect the vehicles’ make and design; and in case any mechanical alteration or overloading is found, a detailed inventory shall be prepared and appropriate orders shall be passed strictly in accordance with law. 1 S.B. C.W.P. No.9721/2025 2 S.B. C.W.P. No.20073/2025 [2026:RJ-JP:667] (3 of 3) [CW-142/2026] 4. This arrangement shall be valid only for carrying the vehicles to the respective office of DTO for the aforesaid verification/inspection and shall not authorize the vehicles to ply on the road for any other purpose. 5. The petitioners, along with their vehicle concerned, shall report to / before the respective DTOs who passed the order of suspension of registration of the subject vehicles, on 27.01.2026, preferably between 11:00 A.M. to 01:00 P.M. Thereafter, due reply shall be filed within a period of 15 days by the petitioners. 6. Audience with respect to the same will be provided by the competent authority on 11.02.2026. Adjudication of the same shall be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days. 7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Stay applications and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/70