Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21236 (HP)

SANGEETA AND OTHERS v. M/S GURU KRIPA AND ANOTHER

CMP.M/697/2026 · 2026-08-27

Sushil Kukreja

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sangeeta & Ors. Vs. M/s Guru Kripa Prop. & Ors. CMP(M) No. 697/2026 27.08.2026 Present: Mr. Mukul, Advocate, vice Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate, for the applicants/appellants. Respondent No. 1 ex parte. Mr. Virender Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No. 2. No reply to the application is intended to be filed. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant, this Court finds sufficient cause to condone the delay that has occurred in filing the present appeal. Consequently, the application is allowed and delay that has occurred in filing the present appeal, is condoned. The application stands disposed of . FAO (MV) No. /2026 Appeal be registered. Heard. Admit. Mr. Virender Sharma, Advocate, accepts service of post admission notice on behalf of respondent No. 2. Let post admission notice be issue to respondent No. 1 returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within two days. List thereafter. In the meantime, let records of learned Tribunal below be also called for. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 27th August, 2026 (raman)