1 2026:CGHC:23695 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2571 of 2026 1 - Rukmani Chauhan D/o Kartikram Chauhan Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Bhanetara P.S. And Tehsil Hasaud District Sakti C.G. 2 - Kartikram Chauhan Amoldas Chauhan Aged About 84 Years R/o Village Bhanetara P.S. And Tehsil Hasaud District Sakti C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur District Raipur C.G. 2 - Chairman Revenue Board Bilaspur C.G. 3 - Commissioner Bilaspur Division Bilaspur C.G. 4 - Collector Sakti District Sakti C.G. 5 - Sub Divisional Office Sakti District Sakti C.G. 6 - Tahsidar Hasaud District Sakti C.G. 7 - S.H.O. P.S. Hasaud District Sakti C.G. 8 - Jugutram Chauhan S/o Sammelal Chauhan Aged About 54 Years Caste Gada R/o Village Bhanetara P.S. And Tehsil Hasaud District Sakti C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri HS Patel, Advocate. For State : Shri RK Gupta, Addl AG. AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.06.16 11:02:17 +0530 2 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 15/06/2026 1. This Writ Petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- 10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, thereby setting aside/quashing the said Impugned Proceedings bearing Revenue Case No. 10/A-56/2012-13 as well as Revenue Case No. 202604312100022/A-6(A)/2025-26 pending adjudication before Respondent No. 6 and orders passed thereto; and further be pleased to direct the Respondent Authorities to initiate fresh proceedings as per law for appointment of vacancy against the post of Kotwar of Village Bhanetara, Tehsil Hasaud, Distt. Sakti (C.G.) in accordance with law 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records of the court below with respect to all the Revenue proceedings pertaining to the case of the petitioners. 10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief, as it may deems fit and appropriate. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appeal before the SDO (Revenue) concerned against the order of Tehsildar by which, the Tehsildar has appointed Kotwar in contravention with rules and acts applicable for appointement of Kotwar. 3 3. Permission granted. 4. Accoridingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash