[2026:RJ-JP:2284] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26672/2018 Ravi Kumar Gurjar S/o Sh. Kunwar Singh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Near Shyam Shiksha Sadan School, Neem Da Gate, Distt. Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Director And Joint Secretary Department Of Local Bodies, 22 Godown Near Civil Lines Phatak Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Commissioner Nagar Nigam, Bharatpur (Raj.) 4. Executive Officer, Nagar Nigam Bharatpur. (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagmohan Bharadwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.P. Singh Rajawat for Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 19/01/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: 1. By appropriate writ, order or direction the selection process by respondents may kindly be quashed and set aside by this Hon'ble Court. 2. By appropriate writ, order or direction, the selection process for appointment of safai karmi (Sweeper), Nagar Nigam Bharatpur, Distt. Bharatpur may kindly be declared null and void. 3. By appropriate writ, order or direction, the selection process for appointment of safai karmi (Sweeper), Nagar Nigam Bharatpur, Distt. Bharatpur may kindly be directed to include the name of [2026:RJ-JP:2284] (2 of 3) [CW-26672/2018] petitioner in the selection list and give him the appointment along with all consequential benefits. 4. By appropriate writ, order or direction, appropriate action may kindly be taken against the office bearers of Nagar Nigam Bharatpur, Distt. Bharatpur for malice selection process. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon order dated 02.02.2024 in SB CWP No.1665/2024 titled as Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. Submits that respondents are duty bound to consider the case of present petitioner. He further submits that this writ petition may be disposed of at this stage as the petitioner is ready to file an affidavit as mandated by the respondents. 3. Having considered the submissions and also the material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to file representation to the respondents. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. [2026:RJ-JP:2284] (3 of 3) [CW-26672/2018] 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /80