[2026:RJ-JP:4070] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 342/2026 Chandra Mohan S/o Shri Hari Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Godoo, District Bikaner Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat Jaipur. 2. The Mission Director (Nhm), Directorate Of Medical Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, C- Scheme, Tilak Marg, Jaipur. 3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Agriculture Management Institute Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur Rajasthan Through Its Secretary. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Brijesh Meti for Mr. Ved Prakash Sogarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devranjan Singh Shekhawat for Mr. Nalin G. Narain, Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 29/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the order dated 04.12.2025, passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in SBCWP No. 17113/2025 titled Mahipal Jakhar & Ors. Vs. State of Raj. & Anr. 2. It is submitted that the controversy involved in the present lis is akin to the ratio laid down in aforesaid dictum, wherein directions were issued to the respondents to decide the [2026:RJ-JP:4070] (2 of 2) [CW-342/2026] representation filed by the petitioners therein, within a stipulated period of 30 days. Learned counsel has prayed that present petition be disposed of in light of the above-referred dictum on lines of the equivalent directions passed therein. 3. Heard. 4. Issue notices. 5. On directions of the Court, Mr. Devranjan Singh Shekhawat appearing for Mr. Nalin G. Narain, and Mr. Prakhar Jain appearing for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC, accept notices on behalf of the respondents. 6. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the submissions put forth by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 7. In light of the consensus drawn between the parties and the considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is disposed of, with the liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the competent authority. 8. The ratio laid down and the directions issued vide the order dated 04.12.2025 passed in Mahipal Jakhar (supra) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case at hand and the respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within the period stipulated therein. 9. Present petition is, accordingly, disposed of in above terms. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /48