Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21222 (RAJ)

SMT. PINTU KANWAR, W/O LATE SHRI PHOOL SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/215/2026 · 2026-01-15

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:1542] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 215/2026 Smt. Pintu Kanwar, W/o Late Shri Phool Singh, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Village Sewa, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar, Rajasthan - 332041. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of School Education Jaipur. 2. The District Education Officer, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 3. The Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Pardoli Bari, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 4. The Joint Director, School Education, Churu Region, Churu, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narendra Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 15/01/2026 1. By way of the present petition, benefit of the compassionate appointment has been sought. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is wife of the deceased and had brain hemorrhage in 2023. It is submitted that the petitioner has applied for the compassionate appointment for her younger son, aged about 19 years and the same came to be rejected citing the provisions enshrined under Rule 5 of the Rajasthan Compassionate Appointment of Dependants of Deceased Government servants Rules, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules of 1996”), as the elder son of petitioner is already in service. Howsoever, [2026:RJ-JP:1542] (2 of 2) [CW-215/2026] learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the instant case of the petitioner falls under the ambit of exception enshrined under Rule 10 of the Rules of 1996. 2. On directions of the Court, learned AAG, Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, has marked his presence. 3. In light of facts and circumstances of the instant case, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose the instant petition, with the directions that if appropriate representation has been filed by the petitioner before respondent No.1, the same shall be considered within a period of 30 days of filing of such representation and a speaking order shall be passed, strictly in accordance with law. 4. In above terms, the present writ petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/19