Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:15335] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1311/2026
1. Hansraj S/o Haribhajan, R/o Peloo Ki Dhani Gram Jaamdoli, Police Station Baroni, District Tonk.
2. Rakesh S/o Ramswaroop, R/o Peloo Ki Dhani Gram Jaamdoli, Police Station Baroni, District Tonk. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Jhala For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Shubham Sain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 13/04/2026
1. Apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No.412/2025 registered at Police Station-Baroni, District-Tonk for the offences under Sections 189(2), 126(2) and 115(2) of BNS, the petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 482 BNSS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor & counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He contended that although there are allegations against the present petitioners of inflicting injuries upon the injured complainant, but as per the
[2026:RJ-JP:15335] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1311/2026] medical report, none of the injuries sustained by the injured are dangerous to life. Learned counsel submits that the matter has now been amicably settled between the parties. Hence, it is prayed that the bail application of the petitioners be allowed.
4.
Learned counsel for the complainant has acceded to the
arguments made by learned counsel for the petitioner and has no objection if the bail is granted to the petitioners.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has however, vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, especially the fact that compromise has been arrived between the parties, without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the bail application of the petitioners.
7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner-Hansraj S/o Haribhajan and Rakesh S/o Ramswaroop, they shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or
[2026:RJ-JP:15335] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1311/2026] indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg/32