M/S RAMNIWAS MINING PRIVATE LIMITED v. CHHATTISGARH GRAMIN BANK
WPC/1434/2026 · 2026-03-31
Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2122 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2122 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:15121
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1434 of 2026 M/s Ramniwas Mining Private Limited Through Its Director Mr. Chandan Agrawal S/o Late Ramniwas Agrawal, Aged About 39 Years, R/o House No. 4, In front Of Axis Bank, Kuchery Road, Rourkela, Sundargarh, Odisha.
... Petitioner versus 1 - Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank Regional Office, Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.) 2 - Collector Cum District Magistrate Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Sub Divisional Magistrate Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Tehsildar Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Superintendent Of Police Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Manoj Bharti S/o Markenday R/o Ward No. 43, Darripara, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Mayank Gupta, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Pravesh Sahu, Advocate For Respondents 2 to 5/State : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. Govt. Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)
Order on Board 01.4.2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):- 1] That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 06.03.2026 (Annex. P/1), passed by Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jabalpur, passed in BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.04.02 17:28:11 +0530
2 S.A No.1276/2025 and also the letter dated 07.03.2026 (Annex.P/9) issued by the respondent bank. 2] Any other further relief(s) that this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice.
2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file appropriate application before appropriate forum.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection if the prayer of the petitioner is allowed.
4. On due consideration, the prayer is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty as sought for.
5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
6. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini