Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21214 (CHH)

SMT SUGNA MUDALIAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2630/2026 · 2026-06-14

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:23697 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2630 of 2026 1 - Smt Sugna Mudaliar W/o Late Shri Shyam Mudaliar Aged About 62 Years R/o Hig Duplex No.- 17, Chhattisgarh Housing Board Colony, Chhatrapati Shivaji Ward, Aghanpur, (Dharampura), Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Housing Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.). 2 - Chhattisgarh Housing Board Through Its Commissioner, Raipur (C.G.). 3 - Executive Engineer Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). 4 - Smt. Swati Mudaliar W/o Shri Jai Mudaliar Aged About 38 Years R/o Dd-15 Chhattisgarh Housing Board Colony, Chhatrapati Shivaji Ward, Aghanpur, (Dharampura), Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (C.G.) Current Address- Teacher, Nirmal Higher Secondary School, Lalbag, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.K. Saxena, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/ State : Mr. Amit Nayak, Panel Lawyer. For Respondents No. 2 & 3 : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 15/06/2026 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 In view of the facts and grounds stated hereinabove, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to: 10.2 That, issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the impugned action/order of mutation/transfer of the subject house in favour of Respondent No. 04, being illegal and arbitrary; 10.3 That, direct the Respondents to restore the possession of the subject house to the Petitioner and to ensure her peaceful residence therein; 10.4 That, declare that the Petitioner, being the widow of the deceased, has a legal right of residence and cannot be dispossessed without due process of law. 10.5 That, issue an appropriate writ, order or direction restraining the Respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession and residence of the Petitioner; 3 10.6 That, direct the Respondents to consider and protect the rights of the Petitioner under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007; 10.7 That, grant any other relief(s) which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file appropriate application before the concerned authorities under the relevant provisions of the Act. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed and the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat