Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21212 (RAJ)

JITENDRA NISHAD S/O SHRI GAYAPRASAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/17152/2025 · 2026-01-29

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4117] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17152/2025 1. Jitendra Nishad S/o Shri Gayaprasad, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Post Bijuri Tehsil Jaisinghpura, Police Station Jaisinghpura Kotwali, District Sultanpur (U.p.) At Present Plot No. 43, Hanuman Vatika, Shrirampur Bas Kokali, Police Station Bhankrota, Jaipur Rajasthan. (At Present In Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). 2. Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Charanlal Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Manota Kalan, Tehsil Nagar, Police Station Jaluki District Deeg At Present Plot No. 40, Hanuman Vatika, Shrirampurbas Kokali, Police Station Bhankrota, Jaipur Rajasthan. (At Present In Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17153/2025 1. Balkrishan Chauhan S/o Shri Kedar Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Khilchipur Bada, Post Urdain, Tehsil Todabhieem, Police Station Balaghat, District Karauli, Presently Plot No. 26, Hanuman Vatika, Shrirampura Bas Kokali Police Station Bhankrota Jaipur West, Rajasthan (Presently Confined At District Jail Jaipur). 2. Omprakash S/o Shri Dhokalram, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Village Nagari Post Dhadholi, Tehsil And Police Station Dudu, District Jaipur, Presently Plot No. 42 Hanuman Vatika, Shrirampura Bas Kokali Police Station Bhankrota Jaipur West. Rajasthan. (Presently Confined At District Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent [2026:RJ-JP:4117] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-17152/2025] S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 363/2026 Govind Puri S/o Kailash Puri, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Itokhoi, Post Dhadholi, Tehsil And P.s. Dudu, District Jaipur At Present R/o Plot No. 34, Hanuman Vatika, Shrirampura Bas Kokali, P.s. Bhankrota, District Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 364/2026 1. Gajanand S/o Late Shri Nand Kishore Kumawat, R/o Village Rojari, Police Station Phulera, District Jaipur (Raj.) Presently Residing At Plot No. 33, Hanuman Vatika, Shrirampura Kokali, Police Station Bhankrota, Jaipur (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur). 2. Sunil S/o Late Shri Nand Kishore Kumawat, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Rojari, Police Station Phulera, District Jaipur (Raj.) Presently Residing At Plot No. 33, Hanuman Vatika, Shrirampura Kokali, Police Station Bhankrota, Jaipur (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sushil Pujari, with Mr. Anurag Sharma and Mr. Jagdish Gujar Mr. Rahul Tiwari Mr. Rajneesh Gupta with Mr. Rahul Sonal and Ms. Khyati Joshi Mr. Anshuman Saxena with Mr. Amit Choudhary and Mr. Vishal Gurjar for For Complainant(s) For State : : Mr. Ravindra Singh Shekhawat Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA [2026:RJ-JP:4117] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-17152/2025] Order 29/01/2026 1. The accused-petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.350/2025 registered with the Police Station Bhankrota, Jaipur (West) for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(2), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 303(2) and 109(1) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsels for the accused-petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor assisted by the learned counsel for the complainant and so also perused the material made available on the record. 4. On perusal of the contents of the First Information Report, there are general allegations against the present accused petitioners. No specific overt act has been assigned to any of the accused-petitioners for causing any particular injury to the injured persons. The accused-petitioners are in custody for last more than one month. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that there are general allegations against the present accused-petitioners in the F.I.R. and no overt act has been assigned to them either in the F.I.R. or in the statement of the injured witnesses recorded under Section 180 B.N.S.S., 2023, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:4117] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-17152/2025] 6. Accordingly, these bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in connected bail applicatons. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /290-293