MATTA SATYANARAYANA, VISAKHAPATNAM & ANOTHER v. SECY, M.A. & U.D. DEPT, HYDERABAD & 3 OTHERS
WP/30853/2013 · 2026-03-02
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21212 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21212 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010276082013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 30853/2013 Between:
1. MATTA SATYANARAYANA, VISAKHAPATNAM & ANOTHER, S/O SRI M.VEERA RAJU,AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/O 27-8-122, OPP:COMMUNITY HALL SRI RAMNAGAR, SRI NAGAR COLONY OLD GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM
2. M.LAKSHMI, W/O M.SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD, R/O 27-8-122, OPP:COMMUNITY HALL SRI RAMNAGAR, SRI NAGAR COLONY OLD GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. SECY M A U D DEPT HYDERABAD 3 OTHERS, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD.
2. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD.
3. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE-CHAIRMAN, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530
003.
2
4. THE VICECHAIRMAN, VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 003
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. J PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU SC For VUDA and MUDA
4. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV
5. P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD(SC FOR VUDA)
3
The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
None appeared for the Writ Petitioners.
2. Sri T.Karthik Chandra Mouli, learned Counsel appeared on behalf of Sri S.Ganesh Babu, learned Standing Counsel for VUDA and MUDA.
3. When the matter was listed on 27.02.2026, none appeared for the Writ Petitioners. This Court directed the matter to be listed today under the caption 8for dismissal9. Today also none appeared for the Writ Petitioners.
4. Having recorded the same and also having regard to the fact that the Writ Petition is pending on the file of this Court since the year 2013, this Court is not inclined to adjourn the Writ Petition.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
_________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 03.03.2026 RMR
4
175
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION No.30853 of 2013 03.03.2026
RMR
5
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. W.P.No.30853 of 2013 PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. No
DATE ORDER Office Note
03. 03.03.2026 GRKP, J
Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. (vide separate order)
___________
GRKP, J RMR
6