- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28970 CRL.RP No. 463 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.463 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. G.V. VENKATESH, S/O VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, GIDDANAPALYA VILLAGE, MUGALURU POST, MAYASANDRA HOBLI, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572221. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RANGASWAMY M.T., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. RAJITH D., S/O LATE DASEGOIWDA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT SUBRMANYANAGARA, TURUVEKERE TOWN AND TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, PROPRIETOR OF DASEGOWDA FERTILIZERS, DABBEGHATTA ROAD, TURUVEKERE TOWN, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572227. …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28970 CRL.RP No. 463 of 2026 THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, TUMAKURU (SITTING AT TIPATUR) IN CRL.A.NO.10027/2025 DATED 31.12.2025 BY CONFIRM THE JUDGEMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION AGAINST THE RESPONDENT PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT TURUVEKERE IN CC.NO.30/2024 DATED 01.08.2025. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER On the previous date of hearing i.e., on 08.06.2026, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner was absent both in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. However, this Court directed the learned counsel for the revision petitioner to make his submission as to whether the suspension of sentence of conditional order is complied or not and also made it clear that if the counsel fails to appear on the next date of hearing, the revision petition will be dismissed. 2. Today even inspite of the matter is called twice both in the morning session and also in the afternoon - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28970 CRL.RP No. 463 of 2026 session, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and also not made any submission regarding compliance. This matter is not yet admitted and hence, the revision petition is dismissed for non-compliance. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39