APHC010268662018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12016/2018 Between: 1. KANTAM VIJAYASUDHA ,, W/O. RAVIKANTH, AGED 39 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, HINDU, R/O D.NO.5-54, CHEBROLU VILLAGE, UNGUTURU (M), WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. CHIKALA VENKATACHANDRA MOULI,, W/O. VENKAYYANAIDU, AGED 43 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO.3-9, PENTAKOTA VILLAGE, PAYAKARAOPETA(M) , VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P. 2. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT., A.P. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. A.P. 4. THE THASILDAR, PITAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT., A.P. 2 JS,J W.P.No.12016 of 2018 5. KONDAMURI TULASIBRUNDAVANAM, W/O VENKATESWARARAO, AGED . MAJOR, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.6-6-35/1, ATCHANTAVARI STREET, TUNI, TUNI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction especially one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in mutating the name of the 5th respondent in Form 1B dt 16-02-2018 without notice and without Jurisdiction and consequentially mutating the entry in favour of the 5th respondent in the revenue records on 03-04-2018 during the pendency of the statutory revision dt.26-5-2017 before the 2nd respondent which is contrary to sec 5(3) and sec 9 of the A.P. Rights in land and pattadar passbooks Act,1971 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, without Jurisdiction and non-application of mind and consequently set aside the same as void and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders of the 4th respondent dt.16-02- 2018 and consequential action taken in mutating the entry in Form 1B dt.03-04- 2018 in favour of the 5th respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 11.04.2018 granted by this Hon'ble Court in IA No.1 of 2018 in WP no. 12016 of 2018 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GANGA KUMAR CHAKRAVARTULA 3 JS,J W.P.No.12016 of 2018 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. E V V S RAVI KUMAR This Court made the following: 4 JS,J W.P.No.12016 of 2018 ORDER: Sri Ganga Kumar Chakravartula, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 10th February, 2026 cbs/rsd 5 JS,J W.P.No.12016 of 2018 THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.137 of 2018 10th February, 2026 cbs/rsd 6 JS,J W.P.No.12016 of 2018