Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21200 (RAJ)

MRS. RAJWANT KAUR, W/O MR. GURVINDER SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/312/2026 · 2026-01-15

Anuroop Singhi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 312/2026 1. Mrs. Rajwant Kaur, W/o Mr. Gurvinder Singh, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Opposite Shiv Temple, Near Punjab National Bank, Foysagar Road, Ajmer (Rajasthan). 2. Mr. Gurvinder Singh Sahmi, S/o Mr. Pyara Singh Sahmi, Aged About 64 Years, Resident Opposite Shiv Temple, Near Punjab National Bank, Foy Sagar Road, Ajmer (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Local Self Government Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Director, Department Of Local Self Government, G-3 Rajmahal Residency Area, Jaipur. 3. Commissioner, Nagar Parishad, Pushkar, District Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prakhar Gupta Mr. Vijayant Yadav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 15/01/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner, very fairly submits that the limited prayer sought in the present writ petition is to direct respondent No.2-Department of Local Self Government to decide the appeal filed by him, being Appeal No.3501/2025 titled as Rajwant Kaur and Anr. vs. Commissioner Nagar Parishad, Pushkar, pending before the respondent No.2 within a stipulated time period. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the said appeal was filed under Section 194(12) read with Section 327 (2 of 2) [CW-312/2026] of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 2009 before respondent No.2 on 13.06.2025 and thereafter, the respondents in the said appeal have duly appeared and even filed reply. Thus, the pleading therein are complete. Considering the limited submissions, more particularly the fact that the Appeal No.3501/2025 was filed before the respondent No.2 on 13.06.2025 and the pleading therein are complete, no prejudice would be caused to either of the parties, if, the said appeal is decided within a period of six weeks from today, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the parties and by passing the speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. Needless to say that direction issued herein should not be construed in any manner, as a direction to decide the appeal in any particular manner, and the same be decided in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. All pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J Diksha/22