[2026:RJ-JP:16464] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14882/2020 Vipin Son Of Shri Hansraj, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Purabsar, Tehsil Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Jaipur City Transport Services Limited, Through Managing Director, Registered Address, Second Floor, Old Woman Hostel, Opp. Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur 302015 2. Officer On Special Duty, Jaipur City Transport Services Limited, Registered Address, Second Floor, Old Woman Hostel, Opp. Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur 302015 ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14883/2020 Devendra Kumar Son Of Shri Ranglal Yadav, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Mau, Post Chandpur, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Jaipur City Transport Services Limited, Through Managing Director, Registered Address, Second Floor, Old Woman Hostel, Opp. Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur 302015 2. Officer On Special Duty, Jaipur City Transport Services Limited, Registered Address, Second Floor, Old Woman Hostel, Opp. Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur 302015 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Singh Shekhawat with Ms. Priyanshi Jaiswal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arnav Singh for Mr. Sandeep Pathak HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN Order 18/04/2026 1. On the request and with the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of both the parties, the present writ petitions are taken up and heard for final disposal at the admission stage. [2026:RJ-JP:16464] (2 of 2) [CW-14882/2020] 2. The present writ petitions have been filed challenging the order of the respondents dated 24.05.2018 (Annex.R/2) wherein the period of participation of the petitioners in strike was treated as break in service period. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents produced an order dated 11.02.2026 passed by the respondents by which the respondents have modified the order dated 24.05.2018 and removed the break in service period of the petitioners. They have been regularized absent period by recalling earlier order. 4. The order dated 11.02.2026 is taken on record. 5. In view of the above, the relief sought by the petitioners has become infructuous. 6. Accordingly, the present writ petitions are dismissed as having rendered infructuous. (MUNNURI LAXMAN),J 32-33--PoonamS/-