- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28528-DB WA No. 49 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT APPEAL NO. 49 OF 2026 (S-RES) BETWEEN: ADITYA PRABHUDEVA TELAGAVI, S/O LATE PRABHUDEVA TELAGAVI, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, NO OCCUPATION, R/O 2130/4, 4TH MAIN, MCC 'A' BLOCK, OPP. DR. UPASI HOUSE, DAVANAGERE - 577 002. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MANJULA N.V., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. REVANNA BELLARY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, JEEVAN PRAKASH, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, SAGAR ROAD, 100 FEET ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201. BY ITS MANAGER (CRM/PS/SSS/CPIO) 2. THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28528-DB WA No. 49 of 2026 SOUTH CENTRAL ZONAL OFFICE, JEEVAN BHAGYA, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD - 560 063. BY ITS ZONAL MANAGER. 3. THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, BRANCH OFFICE 11, PB ROAD, DAVANAGERE - 577 006. BY ITS MANAGER. 4. THE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, JEEVAN PRAKASH, AJJARAKADU, UDUPI - 576 101. BY ITS MANAGER P AND IR …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO FOR SETTING ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 24/01/2022 IN WP NO.1081/2018 ON THE FILE OF THIS COURT DIRECTING RESPONDENT NO.4 APPOINTING APPELLANT AS CLERK ON THE QUALIFICATION OF SSLC PASS ON THE COMPENSATORY GROUNDS UPON THE DEATH OF HIS FATHER PRABHUDEVA TELAGAVI AS RECORD CLERK IN THE OFFICE OF RESPONDENT NO.3 IN SERVICE BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28528-DB WA No. 49 of 2026 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) This writ appeal has been filed after a delay of 1412 days impugning the judgment and order dated 24.01.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP.No.1081/2018. 2. We have perused the affidavit filed by the appellant in support of the application seeking condonation of delay of 1412 days. The reasons stated in the affidavit are neither bonafide nor convincing. Therefore, the application seeking condonation of delay is rejected as a result thereof the writ appeal is also dismissed. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE PK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3