Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21194 (CHH)

SONU SAHU v. SANTOSH YADAV

ACQA/96/2026 · 2026-06-14

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:23859 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 96 of 2026 1 - Sonu Sahu S/o Shri Firtu Ram Sahu Aged About 27 Years R/o House No.118, O.S. Colony Chekpost Dabripara Balco Nagar Korba District- Korba (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Santosh Yadav S/o Shri Bhakku Ram Yadav Aged About 30 Years R/o Ward No . 27 Daihan Para Balco Nagar P.S. Balco Nagar District- Korba (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) Order Sheet 15/06/2026 Ms. Khushboo Khotey, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of recent decision of Supreme Court in case of M/s Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc. 2025 SUMIT KUMAR Digitally signed by SUMIT KUMAR Date: 2026.06.15 18:11:44 +0530 2 Sumit INSC 804, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of present Acquittal Appeal with liberty to file an Appeal under proviso to Section 372 of CrPC (413 of BNSS) before the appropriate court. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the present Acquittal Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal within a period of 60 days from today before the appropriate court in accordance with law. It is made clear that if such an appeal is filed before the concerned court within the time given, it would not insist upon the limitation while deciding the same and will proceed to decide the matter in accordance with law. Registry shall return the certified copy of the impugned order/judgment and relevant documents to the counsel for the petitioner after retaining photocopy of the same. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge