APHC010267682013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 10820/2013 Between: 1.K. PRABHAKARA RAO, S/O. KOTA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/O.BADDIPUDI VILLAGE, ULAVAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, REP BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR (NRGES), PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR DISTRICT COORDINATOR, PROGRAM (MGNRGES) PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGLE. 3.THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVOLOPMENT OFFICER/, PROGRAMME OFFICER MGNREGS ULAVAPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4.THE GOVT OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (PANCHAYATH RAJ DEPARTMENT) SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the impugned proceedings Rc No. D3/193/EGS/2013 dt.9.11.2012 received on 5.12.2012 of the 1st respondent recovery notice basing on the termination of services as Field Assistant contrary to the guidelines and without verifying the records and without conducting proper enquiry there by affecting right to lively hood of the petitioner is highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of the article 14, 16, 21 and 300(A) of the constitution of the India and set a side the same and consequentially to suspend the proceedings in Rc No. D3/193/EGS/2013 dt.9.11.2012 received on 5.12.2012 of the 1st respondent and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 13397 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings in Re No. D3/193/EGS/2013 dt.9.11.2012 received on 5.12.2012 of the 1st respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.N JANARDHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.10820 OF 2013 ORDER : 1. There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.3 submits that the petitioner had earlier challenged the order of removal passed by the Disciplinary Authority and as well as the appellate order dismissing the appeal preferred before the Appellate Authority. The said writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. It is also submitted that, along with the order of termination, a recovery was also ordered. The learned Standing Counsel submits that, by way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has restricted his relief for setting aside the recovery amount ordered. Since the writ petition challenging the substantive order of termination was dismissed by this Court, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated 11.03.2026 KGM 4 150 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.10820 OF 2013 Dated 11.03.2026 KGM