[2026:RJ-JP:121] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17164/2025 Amarsingh Son Of Choturam, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Hariram Ki Dhani Tan Gordhanpura, Police Station Sarund, District Kotaputli, Behror. (Currently In District Jail Kotputli) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 06/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 198/2025 registered at Police Station Sarund, District Kotputli-Behror for the offences under Sections 316(3) and 318(4). 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the name of the petitioner did not appear in the FIR. The petitioner was not the driver of the vehicle bearing No.RJ 09 GD 6728 and not committed any misappropriation of the goods. The allegation of misappropriating the goods are against the drivers of other vehicles. No recovery of any misappropriated goods were effected from the petitioner's possession and the FIR is also delayed. It is also contended that the co-accused Ramesh Yadav who was named in the FIR, was the driver of the another vehicle, has already been enlarged on bail and the petitioner's [2026:RJ-JP:121] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-17164/2025] case is on better footing than the case of the co-accused Ramesh Yadav. The petitioner is in custody since 30.10.2025 and the offence is exclusively triable by Magistrate. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner along with the other co-accused misappropriated the goods handed over to them. The misappropriated goods was of Rs.70,00,000/-, therefore, considering the gravity of the offence, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 30.10.2025 and the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Amarsingh Son Of Choturam, in connection with FIR No. 198/2025 registered at Police Station Sarund, District Kotputli-Behror, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/236