Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21178 (AP)

Turegal Md. Yusuf v. Turegal Liakath Ali

CRP/1065/2020 · 2026-01-05

Subhendu Samanta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010263572020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3560] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1065/2020 Between: 1. TUREGAL MD. YUSUF,, S/O T. ABDUL SAB, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. RETD. VOCATIONAL TEACHER, R/O. D.NO.9/296, MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANW, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. TUREGAL LIAKATH ALI, S/O. T.PEDDA KHASIM SAHEB, MUSLIM AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS , ICE FACTORY OWNER, D.NO. 10/25 MUGATHI PETA, YERNMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. SMT SHIKILGAR PARVEEN BEGUM, W/O. SHIKILGAR MAHABOOB, MUSLIM AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS , HOUSE WIFE, D.NO. 19-327,ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT 3. KARANAM GOUSIA, W/O.KARANAM MOHAMMAD HANEEF, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS ,HOUSE WIFE, NEMAKAL (V) ,CHIPPAGIRI (M), KURNOOL DISTRICT 4. T C MAHABOOB URAF BABU, S/O.LATE.T.GOUSU SAB, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS , MARRIAGE BIURO, D.NO. 8/156 MUGATHI PETA, YEN-UNIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. PODUVU THIKKAIAH, S/O. LATE. P.MALLAIAH, HINDU AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS , FARMER, KARUMANCHI (V) ASPARI (M) , KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. TUREGAL MABU SAB, S/O. T.ISMAIL SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS , FARMER, D.NO. 10/26 MUGATHI PETA, 2 YEMNIIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 7. SMT TUREGAL SEKAN BEE, W/O.T.MABU, MUSLIM AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS , HOUSE WIFE, D.NO. 10/26 MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 8. TUREGAL HAYATH BEE, W/O. LATE T.GAFOOR SAB, MUSLIM AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS HOUSE WIFE, D.NO. 8/22 MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 9. TUREGAL JALEEL, S/O. T.GAFOOR SAB , MUSLIM AGED ABOUT, 68 YEARS , RTC MECHANIC , D.NO. 8/22 MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 10. T IBRAHIM, S/ O. LATE GAFOOR SAB , MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS , MOTOR MECHANIC, D.NO. 8/22 MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 11. TUREGAL KAREEM, S/O. T. GAFOOR SAB RAUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS , TAILOR, D.NO. 8/22 MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 12. TUREGAL GAIBULLA, S/ O. T. GAFOOR SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS , DIED, D.NO. 8/22 MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 13. TUREGAL MOOSA, S/O. T. GAFOOR SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS , DRIVER, D.NO. 8/22 MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 14. TUREGAL ABDUL KHADAR, S/O. T.GAFOOR SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS , BUSINESS , D.NO. 8/22 MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 15. SMT MEHARUNNISA, D/ O. T. GAFOOR SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS , HOUSE WIFE, D.NO. 8/22 MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 16. TUREGAL KHAJA HUSSAIN, S/O. LATE. T.MD. HUSSAIN, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS , BUSSINESS, D.NO. 9/287 MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 17. U M INDIRA DEVI, W/O. U.M. SURAYANARAYA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS , HOUSE WIFE, D.NO. 3/65, UPPARA VEEDI , 3 YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 18. T ABDUL SAHEB, S/ O. T. KHADER SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS , BUSINESS D.NO. 9/373 MUGATHI PETA, YEMRNIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 19. T MD NOORULLA SAHEB, S/ O. T. ABDUL SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS , SUPPLIERS D.NO.9/373 MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 20. T MAHABOOB BI, W/O. T.CHINNA MABU SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS , HOUSE WIFE , D.NO. 9/292 MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 21. T MOHAMMED RAFI, S/ O. T.CHINNA MABU SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS , TV MECHANIC, D.NO. 9/292-A MUGATHI PETA, YERNMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 22. T HIDAYATHULLA, S/ O. T.CHINNA ,NIABU SAB, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS , CARPENTER, D.NO..9/293 MUGATHI PETA, YEINMIGARTUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 23. T MOHAMMED GOUSE, S/O. T.CHINNA MABU SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS , L.I.C. AGENT, D.NO. 9/292-A MUGATHI PETA, YERNMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 24. T MAHAMMED SHAREEF, S/O. T.CHINNA MABU SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS , SUPPLIERS, D.NO. 9/292-A MUGATHI PETA, YERNMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 25. B GOWSIYA BEGUM, D/O. T.CHINNA MABU SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS , HOUSE WIFE, D.NO.'9/292-A MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 26. DR TUREGAL NIZAMUDDIN, S/O.T.ISMAIL SAB, MUSLIM AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS , RTED. MEDICAL OFFICER , D.NO. 1-28, K.H.B.COLONY, PARVATHI NAGAR, CENTRAL JAIL BELLARY,(K.S). 27. S SUBAN, S/O. S.NABI SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS , FARMER, PEDDA MARAVEEDU (V), GONEGARRDLA, KURNOOL DISTRICT 28. P LATHEEF, , S/ O. P.YUSUF, RNUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS , FLOWER BUSINESS D.NO. 1/3393, S.M.T.COLONY, 4 YERNMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 29. TUREGAL ABDUL SALARN, S/O. LATE T.C. KASIM SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS , REAL ESTATE BUSINESS, D.NO. 7/7 MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 30. T A RAWOOF, , S/ O. LATE T.C. KASIM SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS , R.M.P DOCTOR, D.NO. 7/7 MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 31. T A WAHAB, S/O. LATE T.C. KASIM SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS , EGG BUSINESS, D.NO. 7/7 MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 32. D THAHERA BI, W/O. LATE D.A.RASOOL, RNUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS , HOUSE WIFE, D.NO. 7/7 MUGATHI PETA, YERNRNIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 33. H SABEERA BI, W/O. H. SABEER SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS , HOUSE WIFE, D.NO. 21/168 ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 34. R SHAIKSHAVALI, S/ O. R. HUSSAIN PEERA, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS , PRIVATE TEACHER, D.NO. 1/2260/3 WEAVERS COLONY, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 35. T MOHAMMED SHAFI, S/O. LATE T.MD. HUSSAIN SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS , COMMISSION AGENT, D.NO. 9/287, MUGATHI PETA, YERNMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 36. SMT SHAHANAZ BEGUM, D/O. T. MOHAMMED SHAFI, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS , HOUSE WIFE, G.E.KALAKATER COMPOUND, PLAT NO.14, ABDUL HAMEED RAOD, GANESH MANDIR, MALAD WEST,MUMBAI, MAHARASTRA STATE. 37. T ABDUL SUKUR, S/ O. LATE T.MD. HUSSAIN SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS , COOLI, D.NO.7/99-6,RADHA NAGAR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 38. SMT MUNTAZ BEGUM, D/O. T.MD. HUSSAIN SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS , HOUSE WIFE, D.NO.3/296,COMMITI ROAD , YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 39. T KHUDDUS, S/O. T.GOUSE SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS , COLLI, D.NO. 8/156, MUGATHI PETA, YEMMIGANUR, 5 KURNOOL DISTRICT. 40. SMT HASEENA, D/O. KASIM SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS , HOUSE WIFE, D.NO. 18/357/10, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 41. T A BAKKAR, S/O. T. ABDUL SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS , LORRY ONWER, D.NO. 9/291, MUGATHI PETA, YERNMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 42. SYED MABU BASHA, S/ O. LATE S.USMAN, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS , WATCH REPAIRER, D.NO. 9/965, N.T.R.COLONY, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 43. UPPARA YELLAMMA, W/O. CHINNA IYYANNA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS , HOUSE WIFE, D.NO. 4/166,B.C.COLONY, KALLUDEVAKUNTA(V),PEDDAKADUBUR (M), KURNOOL DISTRICT 44. E SREEKANTH PRAKASH, S/O. E.SATYANARAYANA SETTEE, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS , BUSINESS, D.NO. 1/1817- 1,YWCS COLONY, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 45. ELLURU RAGHAVENDRA GUPTA, S/ O. E.SATYANARAYANA SETTEE, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS , KIRANAM BUSINESS, D.NO. 1/1816-1,YWCS COLONY, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 46. STATE, REPRESENTED BY DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL. 47. D SARITHA URAF N LAKSHMI DEVI, W/O.N.GAJENDRA REDDY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS , HOUSE WIFE, D.NO. 2/23-A, B.C. COLONY PANAKALADINNE( V) NANDAVARAM(M), KURNOOL DISTRICT 48. SMT T NOOR JAHAN, W/ O. LATE T.JALEEL MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS , HOUSE WIFE, D.NO. 8/22, MUGATHI PETA , YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 49. T SHAJAHAN, D/O. LATE T.JALEEL, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS , HOUSE WIFE, D.NO. 8/22, MUGATHI PETA , YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 50. T SHAHINA, D/ O. LATE T.JALEEL , MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS , MINOR ( STUDENT ), D.NO. 8/22, MUGATHI PETA , 6 YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 51. T KHALEEL, S/O. LATE T.JALEEL, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS , MINOR ( STUDENT ), D.NO. 8/22, MUGATHI PETA , YEMRNIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 52. T JAMEEL, S/ O. LATE T.JALEEL , MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS , MINOR ( STUDENT ), D.NO. 8/22, MUGATHI PETA YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ( R.50 TO R.52 MINORS REPTD. BY THEIR MOTHER R.49 AS NATURAL GUARDIAN) R-48 TO 52 ARE RESIDING AT D.NO.8/22, MUGATHI FETA, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ) 53. T NOOR BASHSA, S/ O. LATE T.P.KHASIM SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, FINANCIER, D.NO. 10/29, MUGATHI PETA YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT 54. T SATTAR SAB, S/O. LATE T.KHADEER SAB, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS ,(MERCHANT), D.NO. 9/297, MUGATHI PETA , YERNMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toAggrieved by the orders dated 17/12/2019, passed by the Court of II Addl. District Judge, Kurnool at Adoni, in I.A. No.1164 of 2015, in O.S. No.38 of 2011, the Petitioner begs to submit the present Revision Petition IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant ad-interim injunction order, restraining the Respondents, by way of alienating the petition schedule properties by sale, gift, charge, lease, etc., and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to vacate the Status Quo orders passed by this Honble Court in LA. No. 1 of 2020 in C.R.P. No. 1065 of 2020 dated. 28-09-2020 and to pass 7 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K MADHAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K RAJANNA 2. The Court made the following: 8 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1065 of 2020 ORDER: 1. The instant Civil Revision Petition has been preferred against an Order dated 17.12.2019 passed in I.A.No.1164 of 2015 inconnection with O.S.No.38 of 2011 passed by the learned II Additional District Judge, Kurnool. 2. The petitioner being the plaintiff filed a suit for Cancellation of registered sale deed and for subsequent reliefs. The Suit was posted for the Chief Examination. Petitioner being plaintiff has already filed the Chief Affidavit in the Court and also paid a costs of Rs.600/- as earlier directed thereby plaintiff personally appeared before the Court and seeking necessary time to appoint another Advocate in place of his existing Advocate. The learned Court below was not satisfied and directly dismissed the Suit. The petitioner filed an application under Order IX Rule 9 C.P.C to restore the Suit on the same day. The learned Court below has also dismissed the said application by passing the Impugned Order. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition. 3. On plain perusal of this Civil Revision Petition, it appears that against the Order of rejection Under Order XI Rule 9 of C.P.C, a Misc-Appeal is maintainable under Order XLIII, Rule 1(c) of C.P.C. However, the instant Civil Revision Petition has been preferred under Section 115 of C.P.C. and the same is not appears to be maintainable. However, considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case and also considering the reasons it 9 shocks conscience of this Court that the party who was ready with his chief affidavit at the day of examination-in-chief and also paid the costs of Rs.600/- as per earlier direction of the Court below and seeking necessary time to appoint an Advocate, his prayer was strike away and turned down by dismissing the suit. The conduct of the learned Court below, appears to be not reasonable at all. The learned Court below should have maintain judicial patience and discipline in dealing with the cases as litigant is approach Court with faith upon the Court. The conduct of the learned Court below, appears to be curious. Thus, the Orders passed by the learned Court below suffers illegality. 4. Though the instant Civil Revision Petition. filed under Section 115 of C.P.C. It appears for proper determination of the issue in hand the said application is hereby converted to Misc-Appeal. This high Court has jurisdiction to entertain the Misc-Appeal against an Order under IX Rule 9 C.P.C when it is passed by District judge. This Court intends to entertain the instant application after being converted to Misc-Appeal. However, gross illegality and irregularity is appearing in the impugned order passed by the learned Court below. Accordingly, the Impugned Order dated 17.12.2019 as well as Order of dismissal passed by the learned Court below dated 04.11.2015 is hereby set aside. The reasons thereby the suit in O.S.No.38 of 2011 is hereby restored to its original file and number. 5. The petitioner is directed to appear before the learned Court below within one week after Sankranthi Vacation and take appropriate steps. 10 6. Learned Court below is further directed to dispose the suit as early as possible more preferably within four (04) months from the date of passing of this Order. 7. In the result, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, without costs. The interim orders, if any, granted earlier, shall stand vacated. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA Dated:06.01.2026. SSA/CMK