Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21176 (RAJ)

SANJAY S/O SATYANARAYAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/17137/2025 · 2026-01-24

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3390] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17137/2025 Sanjay S/o Satyanarayan, R/o Ajra Gali, Chomukha Bazar Bundi, Police Station Kotwali Bundi, District Bundi (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mrs. Rama Soni, W/o petitioner For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 24/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 338/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Bundi, District Bundi for offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS, 2023. 2. It is submitted on behalf of the accused-petitioner that accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since 04.11.2025. It is also submitted that police after investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the offences as alleged against the accused-petitioner are triable by the Court of Magistrate. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. [2026:RJ-JP:3390] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-17137/2025] 4. As per contents of the First Information Report, the allegation against the accused-petitioner is of making valuation of fake gold as a genuine gold which was being submitted by the customers to the bank for gold loan. 5. Taking into consideration the allegations against the accused-petitioner and the fact that offenses alleged against the accused-petitioner are triable by the Court of Magistrate and also the fact that accused-petitioner is in custody since 04.11.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demer- its of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-peti- tioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /53