Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21176 (ORI)

JAGABANDHU MUDULI v. STATE OF ODISHA

ABLAPL/6806/2026 · 2026-06-19

Aditya Kumar Mohapatra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.6806 of 2026 Jagabandhu Muduli ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. – Mr. P.K. Rath, Sr. Advocate along with Associates -versus- State of Odisha ..... Opposite Party Represented by Adv.- Mr. A.K. Apat, AGA CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 19.06.2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Counsel for the State. Perused the Anticipatory Bail Application as well as the F.I.R. 3. This is an application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by the Petitioner for anticipatory bail, involving offence punishable under Sections 106(1), 288, 125 & 3(5) of the BNS in connection with Nihalprasad P.S. Case No.120 of 2026 pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Gondia. 4. It is stated by Mr. Rath, learned Senior counsel for the Petitioner that all the offences are bailable in nature. He further Page 2 of 2. contended that one of the co-accused has already been extended with the benefits under Section 35 of the BNSS. In view of the aforesaid position, this Court is of the view that the present anticipatory bail application is not maintainable as there is no apprehension of arrest. 5. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is disposed of by granting liberty to the Petitioner to approach this Court again in the event any higher offence is added at the time of filing of the chargesheet. 6. The ABLAPL is disposed of accordingly. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules. ( A.K. Mohapatra) Vacation Judge Suchitra Designation: Junior Stenographer