Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21175 (MAD)

J. Mahalakshmi, v. Joseph Sundar,

CONT P(MD)/770/2026 · 2026-04-15

Hemant Chandangoudar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P(MD)No.770 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR Contempt Petition (MD)No.770 of 2026 in Writ Petition(MD)No.4636 of 2025 J.Mahalakshmi ..Petitioner Vs Joseph Sunder, The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO, O/o The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO, Pandankudi Village, Kottampatti Way, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. ..Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying this Court to punish the respondent herein for committing grave contempt and gross wilful disobedience of the order passed by this court in W.P(MD)No.4636 of 2025 dated 20.02.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.S.A.Ajmalkhan For Respondent : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan Standing Counsel 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P(MD)No.770 of 2026 ORDER In compliance with the direction issued by this Court, the respondent has considered the representation dated 17.12.2024 submitted by the petitioner. In the said representation, the petitioner sought shifting or removal of the electrical line passing over the petitioner’s property, which had been drawn for the purpose of providing electricity service connection to respondents 2 and 3 in the writ petition. While disposing of the writ petition, this Court had issued the following direction: “5. In the light of the above observations, there shall be a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 07.12.2024 on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity to the petitioner, as well as all other persons who may be interested in the subject matter, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is also made clear that this Court has not expressed any view with regard to the merits of the matter and that it is open to the first respondent to consider the same on its own merits.” 2.It is stated by the respondent that a survey will be conducted and, if it is found during such survey that the transmission lines have been drawn over the petitioner’s land, the same will be removed after affording an opportunity to respondents 2 and 3. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P(MD)No.770 of 2026 3. Since the order which is the subject matter of the contempt petition has been complied with, nothing survives for further adjudication in the contempt petition. 4.Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed. The respondent is directed to implement the order dated 06.04.2026 passed pursuant to the directions issued by this Court in W.P.(MD) No. 4636 of 2025, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 15.04.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet:Yes skn To Joseph Sunder, The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO, O/o The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO, Pandankudi Village, Kottampatti Way, Melur Taluk, Madurai District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P(MD)No.770 of 2026 HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J. skn Contempt Petition (MD)No.770 of 2026 in Writ Petition(MD)No.4636 of 2025 15.04.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis