Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21171 (RAJ)

VIJAY PAL DEVATARA S/O SHRI RAMAJI DEVATARA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/20808/2025 · 2026-02-13

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:7023] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20808/2025 Vijay Pal Devatara S/o Shri Ramaji Devatara, R/o Vilalge Bori, Post Chhaja, Tehsil Anandpuri, District Banswara (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Employee Selection Board, Jaipur Through Chairman State Agriculture Management Institution Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur. 3. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.) 4. National Council For Teacher Education, Through Its Director, Hans Bhawan, Wing-II, Bahadur Sah Zafar Marg, New Delhi-110002 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.D. Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devansh Sharma, Dy. G.C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 13/02/2026 1. Defect pointed by the Registry is waived out. 2. Mr. Devansh Sharma, learned Deputy Government Counsel has put in appearance and accepts notices on behalf of respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that controversy involved in this case is squarely covered by the judgment of Division Bench of this Court dated 27.11.2025 passed in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.152/2023 (Bimala Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.) and on the basis of [2026:RJ-JP:7023] (2 of 2) [CW-20808/2025] judgment of Division Bench, Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has also disposed of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.20212/2025 (Vijay Shankar Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) vide order dated 19.12.2025. 4. This fact has also not been disputed by learned counsel for the respondents. 5. In view of above consensus between learned counsels for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of with the same directions as given in the case of Bimala Kumari (supra). 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/139