APHC010272052024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13547/2024 Between: 1. NASINA GOPALAIAH,, S/O. RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O.UTTAM NELLORE VILLAGE, KOTA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2. NASINA POLAIAH,, S/O. RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/O. CHUTTUGUNTA VILLAGE, OJILI MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUDUR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHILLAKUR POLICE STATION, CHILLAKUR, CHILLAKUR MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13547/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 4th respondent in interfering with the petitioners’ possession and threatening the petitioners to vacate the land of an extent Ac.1.00 cents each in Sy.No.944-9 and Sy.No.944-8 respectively, situated at Kadivedu village, Chillakur Mandal, Tirupathi District as illegal, arbitrary, one without jurisdiction and violation of Article 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently to direct 4th respondent not interfere with the petitioners’ possession over the lands i.e., Ac.1.00 cents in Sy.No.944-9 and Ac.1.00 cents in Sy.No.944-8 respectively, situated at Kadivedu village, Chillakur Mandal, Tirupathi District.…” 2. Heard Sri Kambhampati Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the respondent- police are interfering with the petitioners’ possession over the subject property and insisting them to vacate the subject land. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions would submit that the respondent-police are not interfering with the possession of the petitioners over the subject property. 4 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-police are directed not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners, except under due process of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 13547/2024 Dated.05.01.2026 UPS