CRM-M-31965 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 160 ARVIND YADAV STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PARTA directions to 193 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita FIR No.59 dated 16.03.2026, under Section 127(6) of BNS, Police Station Division 3, Ludhiana. 2. petitioner before the respondent No.2 stipulated time. 3. 31965-2026 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH ARVIND YADAV VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Mr. Sahaj Punj, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the directions to the respondents No.1 to 3 to file the police report under Section Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita FIR No.59 dated 16.03.2026, under Section 127(6) of BNS, Police Station Division 3, Ludhiana. The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the r has filed the representation dated 29.04.2026 the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within stipulated time. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31965-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 29.05.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH for the petitioner. Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. as been filed by the petitioner 3 to file the police report under Section Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case arising out of FIR No.59 dated 16.03.2026, under Section 127(6) of BNS, Police Station sel representing the petitioner submits that the dated 29.04.2026 (Annexure P earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within to respondents No.1 to 3. (O&M) 2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS for 3 to file the police report under Section in a case arising out of FIR No.59 dated 16.03.2026, under Section 127(6) of BNS, Police Station sel representing the petitioner submits that the (Annexure P-4) earned counsel prays for directions to the to decide the abovementioned representation within the GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.29 19:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-31965 upon the State 5. hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a month from the date of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioner (Annexure P Ludhiana the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police. It is however clarified that finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. independent assessment with regard to contents of r petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own level. 6. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 31965-2026 (O&M) 8587 Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, upon the State is hereby dispensed with. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a month from the date of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioner (Annexure P-4) be disposed of either by the Ludhiana or, on assignment by him, by any other police officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police. It is however clarified that finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 independent assessment with regard to contents of r petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own level. In view of above, the present petition is hereby disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab Hence service of notice Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioner ) be disposed of either by the Commissioner of Police, or, on assignment by him, by any other police officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police. It is however clarified that finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents 2 shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the , and take an independent decision at his own level. In view of above, the present petition is hereby disposed of. :Yes/No : Yes/No Hence service of notice Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioner Commissioner of Police, or, on assignment by him, by any other police officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents shall be at liberty to make an epresentation of the GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.29 19:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document