[2026:RJ-JP:1559] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17095/2025 Mukesh Kumar S/o Vijay Nath, R/o N22/b 385, Kaushalpuri, Ajadpur, Police Station Adarsh Nagar, District Delhi ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer, District Ajmer) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Pramila Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 15/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 283/2025 registered at Police Station Pushkar, District Ajmer for the offences under Sections 310(4), 313 and 111(3) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the charge-sheet against the petitioner has already been submitted. The other co-accused Jagdish Arya has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 16.12.2025 and the case of the petitioner is identical to the other co-accused. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 18.09.2025 and further trial of the case may take considerable [2026:RJ-JP:1559] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-17095/2025] time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner and the other co- accused were caught red handedly by the police and when they were planning to commit dacoity. The petitioner is a habitual offender and against him 14 cases were registered in various police station in Rajasthan and also in Delhi, therefore, considering the above facts, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the other similarly placed co- accused against whom 13 cases were registered has already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench and the case of the petitioner is identical to the other co-accused, therefore, considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Mukesh Kumar S/o Vijay Nath, in connection with FIR No. 283/2025 registered at Police Station Pushkar, District Ajmer, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:1559] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-17095/2025] 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within a period of 7 days from his release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned Trial Court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/153