Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21156 (PAT)

Binda Nut v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./38311/2026 · 2026-07-01

Satyavrat Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38311 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-459 Year-2025 Thana- BANIAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Binda Nut S/o Dudhnath Nut R/o village - Harpur Karah, P.S - Baniyapur, District - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hemant Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 01-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is in custody since 03.05.2026 and allegation is of recovery of 50 liters of liquor from a motorcycle along with 800 liters of semi prepared liquor which was destroyed, further 140 liters of liquor from a motorcycle and a Bolero vehicle, 5 liters of liquor from possession of Rajdeo and 5 liters of liquor from possession of Satrudhan along with 1200 liters of semi prepared liquor was also recovered which was destroyed. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38311 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of any of the seized vehicles and he came to be implicated at the instance of Chowkidar with whom he is on an inimical term. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the bail application of the petitioner. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Baniyapur P.S. Case No. 459 of 2025. Rishabh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T