Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21156 (DEL)

ANIL SHARMA v. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

CRL.M.C./5807/2026 · 2026-10-07

Amit Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL.M.C. 5807/2026 $~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010366322026 + CRL.M.C. 5807/2026 ANIL SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jai Kumar and Mr. Arun Kumar Rana, Advocates. Petitioner in person. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for State. Ms. Moni Rexwal, Advocate for R-2. R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 07.10.2026 1. The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No.132/2021 dated 13th April, 2021 under Sections 354A/509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) registered at Police Station Ghazipur and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the basis of settlement. 2. Issue notice. 3. Notice is accepted by the APP appearing on behalf of the State and by the parties who appear in person. 4. It is stated that the a complaint was filed by respondent no.2 against the petitioner, which resulted in filing of the present FIR. 5. Now, the parties have settled their disputes and differences in terms of the Memorandum of Settlement (‘MoU’) dated 20th July, 2026, which has This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2026 at 12:00:36 CRL.M.C. 5807/2026 been filed as Annexure P-2 to the petition. 6. The parties are present in Court and have been identified by their respective counsel and the Investigating Officer (‘IO’). 7. The respondent no.2 is present in Court and has been identified by her counsel as well as by the Investigating Officer (‘IO’). She informs the Court that she has settled the matter of her own free will and without any coercion. She further states that she has no objection to quashing of the present FIR. 8. The petitioner is also present in Court and have been identified by his counsel. He undertakes to abide by the terms of settlement arrived at between the parties. 9. Considering the fact that the parties have now resolved their disputes, there is no use continuing with the proceedings under the present FIR as it would be a misuse of the process of the Court and an unnecessary burden on the State exchequer. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the aforementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. 10. Accordingly, the present proceedings under FIR No.132/2021 registered at Police Station Ghazipur and the proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed. 11. The petition stand disposed of accordingly. AMIT BANSAL, J OCTOBER 7, 2026 Rzu This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2026 at 12:00:36