Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21152 (AP)

M/S VISWAM CONSTRUCTIONS v. SRI SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT

CC/2839/2024 · 2026-01-07

Ninala Jayasurya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010272712024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2839/2024 Between: 1. M/S VISWAM CONSTRUCTIONS, (FIRM NO. 84 OF 2011 @ THE REGISTER OF FIRMS, PRODDUTUR), REP BY ITS THE MANAGING PARTNER, N. VISWANTHA REDDY, S/O. BALA GURIVI REDDY, R/O. D.NO. 12/524-1, DC GOVIDA REDDY NAGAR, TB ROAD, PORUMAMILLA, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SHAMSHER SINGH RAWAT, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. SRI P S PRADYUMNA, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, . A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 3. SRI V VIJAY RAMA RAJU, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. SRI RAMA CHANDRA, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, (R AND B) NH, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. SRI K HARI PRASAD, THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (R AND B), NH CIRCLE, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT. 2 6. SRI C VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINNER R AND B N.J.DIVISION, KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to take to cognizance the offence of Contempt of Court committed by the respondents herein and to punish them for violating the orders dated 09.01.2024 passed in W.P No. 31917 2023 by Hon’ble Sri Justice NINALA JAYA SURYA. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU 2. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 3. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2839/2024 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the cause in the present Contempt Case does not survive. 2. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J Date:08.01.2026 ARB 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2839/2024 Date:08.01.2026 ARB