Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21150 (RAJ)

CHANDRA S/O DHANNA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/17010/2025 · 2026-01-20

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2372] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17010/2025 1. Chandra S/o Dhanna, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Jalkhera, Police Station Masuda, District Beawar. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). 2. Polu S/o Dhanna, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Jalkhera, Police Station Masuda, District Beawar. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). 3. Pappu S/o Dhanna, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Jalkhera, Police Station Masuda, District Beawar. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). 4. Sethu S/o Dhanna, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Jalkhera, Police Station Masuda, District Beawar. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Kumar Maheshwari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, Public Prosecutor Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 20/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioners in connection with FIR No.349/2025 registered at Police Station Masuda, District Beawar for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) & 351(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor assisted by counsel for the complainant and also perused the challan papers. [2026:RJ-JP:2372] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-17010/2025] 4. The Police after completion of investigation has already submitted charge-sheet against the accused-petitioners for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 117(2), 118(2), 110 & 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 5. It has also come out that there are cross-cases in between the parties and both the parties belong to same family and the dispute as arose in regard to sowing the agriculture field. The Police after completion of investigation has already submitted the charge-sheet in the matter and the accused-petitioners are in custody since 11.12.2025. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners and the fact that the Police after completion of investigation has already submitted the charge-sheet and none of the injury opined to be dangerous to life, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /135