Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21149 (RAJ)

KARTIK SHARMA S/O SHRI ASHOK KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/17123/2025 · 2026-01-23

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3319] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 6th Interim Bail Application No. 17123/2025 Kartik Sharma S/o Shri Ashok Kumar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o A-2 A, Navdeep Vihar, Bhoora Patel Marg, Gandhi Path, Jaipur. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Gausinga Mr. Sahil Sharma Mr. Ikhlash Mohd Mr. Navditya Lalsotia Mr. Sanskar Meena Ms. Prapti Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 23/01/2026 1. The present 6th interim bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in the present matter arising out of FIR No.278/2024 registered at P.S. Karni Vihar, District Jaipur (West) for offences under Sections 323, 308 and 143 of IPC, 1860. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present interim bail application has been preferred on the ground that the petitioner’s father is suffering from Stage IV cancer and is presently undergoing treatment at SMS Hospital, Jaipur. Learned [2026:RJ-JP:3319] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-17123/2025] counsel has produced medical prescriptions and relevant documents to substantiate the said fact and to show that the petitioner is the sole son of his parents. Hence, it is prayed that the present interim bail application may kindly be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has produced the verification report submitted by the SHO, Police Station Karni Vihar, District Jaipur (West), wherein the fact regarding that petitioner’s father is suffering from cancer and he is the sole son of his parents have been duly verified. He further submits that the father of the petitioner was earlier convicted under Sections 308, 323, and 143 of the IPC. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of interim bail to the petitioner for a limited period. 6. Accordingly, the interim bail application filed under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Kartik Sharma S/o Shri Ashok Kumar, be released on interim bail for a period of 30 (thirty) days, subject to the condition that he shall furnish a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of Superintendent of Central Jail for his surrender on completion of 30 (thirty) days from the date of his actual release. It is further directed that on being released, the petitioner shall not try to contact in any manner with complainant and also shall not enter the area of the complainant's residence/house. If the petitioner fails to surrender after the expiry of interim bail period, [2026:RJ-JP:3319] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-17123/2025] the authorities shall be at liberty to proceed against him in accordance with law. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/97