CWP No.15814 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 171 RUMAL SINGH AND ORS. RUMAL SINGH AND ORS. RUMAL SINGH AND ORS. RUMAL SINGH AND ORS. Vs Vs Vs Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Present: Mr. for the petitioners. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) [1]. The short grouse raised on behalf of the petitioners/landowners is that the application under Section 28 their instance has not been adjudicated upon by respondent No.2. [2]. Learned State counsel instance of the petitioners/landowners shall be decided within two months from today after affording opportunity of hearing to order thereafter. A copy thereof shall also be s within two weeks of passing of the order. [3]. In such circumstances, the present petition is disposed of. However, it is directed that in case the petitioners/landowners enhancement of comp released to them within six weeks of passing of statutory benefits and interest abide by the aforesaid time schedule cost(s) of Rs.20,000/ [4]. Pending application(s), if any shall also stand disposed of. May May May May 22227777, 202 , 202 , 202 , 2026666 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2026 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. CWP No. CWP No. CWP No.15814 15814 15814 15814 Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: RUMAL SINGH AND ORS. RUMAL SINGH AND ORS. RUMAL SINGH AND ORS. RUMAL SINGH AND ORS. ...... ...... ...... ...... STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ....Respondent ....Respondent ....Respondent ....Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Mr. R.S. Manhas, Advocate for the petitioners. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) The short grouse raised on behalf of the petitioners/landowners is that the application under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 preferred at their instance has not been adjudicated upon by respondent No.2. Learned State counsel informs that the application preferred at the instance of the petitioners/landowners shall be decided within two months from today after affording opportunity of hearing to them . A copy thereof shall also be supplied to the petitioners/landowners within two weeks of passing of the order. In such circumstances, the present petition is disposed of. However, it is directed that in case the petitioners/landowners enhancement of compensation on the basis of re released to them within six weeks of passing of statutory benefits and interest under the 1894 Act abide by the aforesaid time schedule, the officer concerned shall be liable to pay a cost(s) of Rs.20,000/- per month to the petitioners/landowners Pending application(s), if any shall also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH 15814 15814 15814 15814 of 2026 (O&M) of 2026 (O&M) of 2026 (O&M) of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision:22227777....00005555.202 .202 .202 .2026666 ...... ...... ...... ......Petitioner Petitioner Petitioner Petitionerssss ....Respondent ....Respondent ....Respondent ....Respondentssss HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJAAAA The short grouse raised on behalf of the petitioners/landowners is that A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 preferred at their instance has not been adjudicated upon by respondent No.2. informs that the application preferred at the instance of the petitioners/landowners shall be decided within two months from them by way of passing a speaking upplied to the petitioners/landowners In such circumstances, the present petition is disposed of. However, it is directed that in case the petitioners/landowners are found entitled for any ensation on the basis of re-determination, the same be released to them within six weeks of passing of the order along with all other under the 1894 Act. In case, respondent No.2 fails to , the officer concerned shall be liable to pay a per month to the petitioners/landowners. Pending application(s), if any shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE 1 The short grouse raised on behalf of the petitioners/landowners is that A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 preferred at informs that the application preferred at the instance of the petitioners/landowners shall be decided within two months from by way of passing a speaking upplied to the petitioners/landowners In such circumstances, the present petition is disposed of. However, it found entitled for any determination, the same be order along with all other . In case, respondent No.2 fails to , the officer concerned shall be liable to pay a MOHMED ATIK 2026.05.27 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment