Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21144 (ORI)

KIRAN KUMAR DIGAL v. STATE OF ODISHA

ABLAPL/6877/2026 · 2026-06-19

V Narasingh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ABLAPL No.6877 of 2026 Kiran Kumar Digal …. Petitioner Mr. B. K. Behera, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. C. Mohanty, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 19.06.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.T. Case No.93 of 2023 pending on the file of learned JMFC, G. Udayagiri, Kandhamal arising out of Tikabali P.S. Case No.14 of 2023 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 294/341/307/34 of IPC. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the overt act has been attributed to the one Gobinda Digal and Vicky Digal, who are stated to have assaulted to the husband of the informant and on instruction, submits that injury suffered by the injured is simple. Hence, he may be protected by pre-arrest bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer during the currency of investigation. 5. Taking into account the nature of allegations, this Court directs that on surrendering within three weeks hence and moving for bail, the Petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Court in seisin on such terms as deemed just and proper subject to the injury being categorized as simple. 6. It is needless to state that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the ongoing investigation. 7. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of. (V. NARASINGH) Vacation Judge Soumya