Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21142 (RAJ)

BHAWANI SINGH S/O DEVI SINGH v. MANAGING DIRECTOR

CW/453/2026 · 2026-01-20

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2829] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 453/2026 Bhawani Singh S/o Devi Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Rajput Colony, Kansua, Police Station Udyog Nagar, District Kota (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. Executive Director (Traffic), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Kota Depot, District Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. T.C. Vyas For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajpal Dhankar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 20/01/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “i) to issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby may kindly be quashed and set aside the entire recovery proceedings of corporation respondents in relation to recover amount of Rs.1,19,895 from the petitioner. ii) to issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby may kindly be quashed and set aside impugned order dated 27.11.2025 also recovery Proceedings initiated in pursuance of same by the respondents liable to be set aside.” [2026:RJ-JP:2829] (2 of 3) [CW-453/2026] 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 09.09.2024 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14561/2024 titled as Hemraj Gurjar Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of ratio laid down in case of Hemraj Gurjar Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Hemraj Gurjar Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his [2026:RJ-JP:2829] (3 of 3) [CW-453/2026] representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /169