JAMKPALA MOHAN NAIDU v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/13505/2025 · 2026-01-29
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21142 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21142 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
RC,J W.P.No.13505 of 2025 1
APHC010270132025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 13505/2025 Between:
1. JAMKPALA MOHAN NAIDU, S/O. MUNNASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE R/AT. D.NO. 1-34, VANAMALADINNE, PUNGANUR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. D.MALLIKARJUNA, S/O. D.VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE R/AT. VANAMALADINNE, PUNGANUR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , DPC,MGNREGS CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINDENT ENGINEER, WRD-IRRIGATION CIRCLE, CHITTOOR. 5. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, IRRIGATION DIVISION, PALAMANER,
RC,J W.P.No.13505 of 2025 2
CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. P PAVAN, S/O. CHANDRA SEKHAR AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR R/AT. VANAMALADINNE, VILLAGE AND POST PUNGANUR TOWN , CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents No. 3 to 5 in considering petitioners representation made in CTR202505053312, dated 05-05-2025 and contemplating to release the Bills amount in favor of respondent No.6 for the non execution of Restoration of Supply Channel Work from Nagalakunta to Eduru Cheruvu near Vanamaladinne Village, Punganur Mandal, Chittoor District which is just commenced and not at all completed, as arbitrary, illegal and quite contrary to the well established legal principles apart from being voilative of the fundamental rights guaranteed to petitioners under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No. 3 to 5 not to release the Bills amount in favor of respondent No.6 until the Restoration of Supply Channel Work from Nagalakunta to Eduru Cheruvu near Vanamaladinne Village, Punganur Mandal, Chittoor District and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 3 to 5 to consider petitioners representation, dated 05- 05-2025, and taking necessary steps for stoppage of Bills amount in favor of respondent No.6 till the enquiry is completed, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant leave to the Respondent No.5 to file Counter Affidavit in W.P.No. 13505 of 2025 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
RC,J W.P.No.13505 of 2025 3
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant leave to the respondent no.6 in the Writ Petition No. 13505 of 2025 to file Counter Affidavit in the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.
S PARINEETA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV
3. M.S.BANU PRASAD RAO
4. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following:
RC,J W.P.No.13505 of 2025 4
ORDER
Ms. S.Parineeta, learned counsel for the petitioner, sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. In view of the submission, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 30th day of January, 2026. RR