Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21140 (AP)

Ethalapaka Deenadayal Ravi Varma v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/11880/2018 · 2026-01-27

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010265962018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11880/2018 Between: 1. ETHALAPAKA DEENADAYAL RAVI VARMA, S/O LATE SYAM PRASAD PHALGUNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO. 202, D.NO. 2-146, CHARITHA PRIDE APARTMENT, SRINAGAR COLONY, GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM CUM TRIBUNAL SITUATED UNDER THE MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT, 2007, VISAKHAPATNAM REVENUE DIVISION, VISAKHAPATNAM 4. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, VISAKHAPATNAM 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, IV THE TOWN POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM 6. SMT ETHALAPAKA SURYAPRABHA DIED AS PER L R R7, W/O. LATE SYAMPRASAD PHALGUNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 48-15-23, ASHOK NAGAR, ASIL METTA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 016 2 7. ETHALAPAKA MADHAVI LATHA, W/O I.V.RAMANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O D.NO.48-15-23, ASHOK NAGAR, NEAR GVMB ZONE-II, ASILMETTA, VISAKHAPATNAM-16. R7 IS BROUGHT ON RECORD AS L.R OF THE DECEASED 6TH RESPONDENT AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.07.11.2025 IN I.A.NO.01 OF 2023. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, direction or order more particularly one in the name of writ of Certiorari calling for the records in Rs. No. 7132/2017/RCRI (case No. 3 of 2017) of the 3rd respondent and to set aside the same as arbitrary, illegal, null and void violative of principles of natural Justice and contrary to the provisions of the Maintenance and welfare of the Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the orders in Rc.No. 7132/2017/RCRI (Case No. 3/2017) dated 21.03.2018, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit me to come on record as the respondent No.7 being the legal heir of the deceased 6th respondent to put-forth my case in the above Writ Petition No. 11880 of 2018, in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BALAJI MEDAMALLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. K JYOTHI PRASAD 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Ms. B. Harika, learned counsel, representing Sri Balaji Medamalli, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order granted earlier shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 28.01.2026 KAS 4 168 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11880/2018 Dated: 28.01.2026 KAS