Page No.# 1/4 GAHC020000452026 2026:GAU-NL:41 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/12/2026 MR. LONGSHAH AND 9 ORS S/O PHUHKHAM, R/O LONGWA WASA VILLAGE, P.O. MON, DISTRICT - MON, NAGALAND, 798621 2: MR. TOKWANG ANGHA S/O NOKPANG ANGHA R/O PHUKTONG VILLAGE P.O. MON DISTRICT - MON NAGALAND 798621 3: MR. LAMLAM K S/O KHOATEH R/O TIZIT VILLAGE P.O./P.S. TIZIT MON DISTRICT - MON NAGALAND 798621 4: MR. P. ANOK S/O PHONGWANG R/O SHEANGHAH CHINGNYU VILLAGE P.O. MON DISTRICT - MON NAGALAND 798621 5: MR. NOKNYIM KONYAK S/O AHON R/O NOKZANG VILLAGE Page No.# 2/4 P.O. TIZIT DISTRICT - MON NAGALAND 798621 6: MR. T. PHONGNGAM KONYAK S/O TANGBO KONYAK R/O SHAENGHAH CHINGNYU VILLAGE P.O. MON DISTRICT - MON NAGALAND 798621 7: MR. YANO KONYAK S/O TAHSAK R/O LOAKKUN VILLAGE P.O./P.S. TIZIT DISTRICT - MON NAGALAND 798621 8: MR. HONLEI C KONYAK S/O CHINGAT KONYAK R/O SHEANGHAH CHINGNYU VILLAGE P.O. MON DISTRICT - MON NAGALAND 798621 9: MR. C YU-AO KONYAK S/O CHINGJAN R/O SHENAGHAH WAMSA VILLAGE P.O. MON DISTRICT - MON NAGALAND 798621 10: MR. WANGLEM S/O PANGKHAO R/O YANNU VILLAGE P.O./P.S. TIZIT DISTRICT - MON NAGALAND 79862 VERSUS Page No.# 3/4 STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND, 797001 2:THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST AND HEAD OF FOREST FORCE NAGALAND KOHIMA 797001 3:CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST HQ NAGALAND KOHIMA 797001 4:DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER MON NAGALAND 79862 Advocate for the Petitioner : MANJONG KONYAK, Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 05-02-2026 Heard Mr. Manjong Konyak, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. A. Ayemi, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State respondents. Mr. Manjong Konyak, learned counsel for the petitioners after attempting to argue the matter submits that he be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file the same with better particulars. The prayer is not objected to by the learned counsel for the Page No.# 4/4 respondents. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal, with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant