APHC010255682018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3367] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS I.A.NO.9 OF 2025 IN/AND APPEAL SUIT No.519 of 2018 Between: 1. INDLA RAGHAVULU, S/O. I. NARASIMHULU CHETTY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, OCC-AGRICULTURIST. R/O. KONAPPAGUNTA VILLAGE, NANDIMANGLAM POST, PUTTUR MANDAL, CHITTOR DISTRICT. 2. INDLA SUBBAIAH,, S/O. I. NARASIMHULU CHETTY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURIST. R/O. KONAPPAGUNTA VILLAGE, NANDIMANGLAM POST, PUTTUR MANDAL, CHITTOR DISTRICT. 3. INDLA KANNAIAH,, S/O. I. NARASIMHULU CHETTY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURIST. R/O. KONAPPAGUNTA VILLAGE, NANDIMANGLAM POST, PUTTUR MANDAL, CHITTOR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. KURAGAYALA NAGABHUSHANAMMA, W/O. K. RAGHAVULU CHETTY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O. KANAKAMPALYAM VILLAGE, NANDIMANGALAM POST, PUTTUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. BATULA SUNDARAMMA, W/O. B. CHENGAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. KANAKAMPALYAM VILLAGE, NANDIMANGALAM POST, PUTTUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. INDLA MUNEMMA DIED, CHITTOOR 4. KURAGAYALA PADMANABHAM, S/O. MUNIGAGULU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURIST. R/O. KONAPPAGUNTA VILLAGE, NANDIMANGLAM POST, 2 PUTTUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. INDLA YASODAMMA, W/O. I. VENKATESVVARLU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURIST. R/O. KONAPPAGUNTA VILLAGE, NANDIMANGLAM POST, PUTTUR MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): May be pleased to allow the Appeal Suit against the Judgment and Decree passed in OS No.156 of 2008, dt.01.01.2018 on the file of the Court of the IV Additional District Judge, Tirupati, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased This Honorable court has ample power to stay the final decree proceedings in O.S.no.156/2008 on the file of the IV Additional District Judge, Tirupathi pending disposal of the Appeal suit and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to amend the plaint schedule by adding the S.Nos. 105/A, 108/B, S.no.108/15, S.No.109/6, 110/7, 109/4, 109/5 of Nandimangalam village in the plaint schedule properties of O.S.No.156 of 2008 on the file of the IV Additional District judge, Tirupathi and pass preliminary decree by dividing the above lands and allot share in favour of Plaintiffs/respondents /decree holders, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the appellants not to alienate the plaint schedule properties in O.S.No.156 of 2008 on the file of the IV Additional District judge, Tirupathi, pending disposal of the above A.S.no.519 of 2018, and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, 3 the High Court may be pleased may be please to condone the delay of 1558 days in filing the legal representative Petition in respect of 2nd Respondent in A.S.No.519 of 2018 pending before this Hon’ble Court and to pass IA NO: 4 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be please to set aside the abetment in respect of 2nd Respondent in A.S.No.519 of 2018 pending before this Hon’ble Court and to pass IA NO: 5 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be please to permit the Petitioners/Proposed Respondents No. 6 to 10 to come on Record as Legal Representatives of 2nd Respondent i.e., Batula Sundaramma as Respondents No. 6 to 10 in A.S.No.519 of 2018 and all it’s consequential proceedings before this Hon’ble Court and to pass IA NO: 6 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be please to condone the delay of 2113 days in filing the Legal Representative Petition in respect of 2nd Appellant in A.S.No.519 of 2018 pending before this Hon’ble Court and to pass IA NO: 7 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be please to set aside the abetment in respect of 2nd Appellant in A.S.No.519 of 2018 pending before this Hon’ble Court pass IA NO: 8 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be please to permit the Petitioners/Proposed Appellants No. 4 to 7 to come on Record 4 Legal Representatives of 2nd Appellant i.e., I.Subbaiah as Appellants No. 4 to 7 in A.S.Ng.519 of 2018 and all it's as consequential proceedings before this Hon'ble Court and to pass IA NO: 9 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to Record the compromise under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and to Dispose of A.S. No. 519 of 2018 in terms of the compromise and Pass a compromise decree binding on all parties and persons claiming through them and to pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): O UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P GANGA RAMI REDDY 2. SARMA C V S S 5 The Court made the following: COMMON JUDGMENT: Both the parties i.e., appellants as well respondents jointly filed the I.A.No.9 of 2025 under Order 23 Rule 3 of C.P.C. to record the joint compromise memo, which is filed along with this application, and to pass a decree in terms of compromise as mentioned in the said joint compromise memo. 2. Both parties present before the Court, they admitted the terms of compromise mentioned in the said joint compromise memo as true and correct, gave consent to record the same. 3. Both the parties have filed their photostate-copy of Aadhaar card and they were identified by their respective learned counsel. 4. Pursuant to the above, I.A.No.9 of 2025 is ordered by recording compromise between the parties as per the terms of compromise mentioned in the joint compromise memo, which shall be part and parcel of the decree and judgment in the present Appeal Suit No.519 of 2018. 5. Since the joint compromise memo is accepted by both the parties and in view of the above mentioned 6 circumstances, the appeal in A.S.No.519 of 2018 is disposed of by granting a decree in-terms of compromise arrived at I.A.No.9 of 2025. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier if any, stand vacated. Miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS Date: 21.01.2026 Krs 7 130 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS I.A.NO.9 OF 2025 IN/AND APPEAL SUIT No.519 of 2018 ( Common Judgment ) DATE: 21.01.2026 Krs