THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER v. SRI RANGAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS
MFA/4684/2025 · 2026-06-09
Pradeep Singh Yerur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21130 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21130 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27640 MFA No. 4684 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4684 OF 2025 (LAC) BETWEEN:
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER UPPER BHADRA PROJECT HOSADURGA DIVISION HOSADURGA CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI PRASHANTH B.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI RANGAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY LRS.
1.
SRI THIPPESHAPPA S/O. RANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/O. KARIDIKATTE VILLAGE MADADAKERE HOBLI HOSADURGA TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.
2. SUMALATHA W/O. RANGAPPA D/O. RANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS.
3. PARVATHAMMA W/O. LINGARAJU AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS BENAKANAHALLI VILLAGE MADADAKERE HOBLI CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.
Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27640 MFA No. 4684 of 2025
4.
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER UPPER BHADRA PROJECT CHITRADURGA CHITRADURGA DISTRICT.
5.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 74(1) OF RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 05.04.2025 PASSED IN LAC NO. 83/2019 ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHITRADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE REFERENCE PETITION U/S.64(1) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for appellant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27640 MFA No. 4684 of 2025
Placing the memo on record, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn, Registry is directed to refund the Court fee to the appellant, subject to proper verification and upon furnishing the requisite Bank account details for remittance through RTGS.
Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE
CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6