APHC010270062019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 12285/2019 Between: 1. D. IQBAL HUSSAIN,, S/O LATE BASHUMIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, H. NO. 24/67A, GANIGALLI STREET, KURNOOL TOWN AND DISTRICT. 2. AHMED HUSSAIN,, S/O LATE BASHUMIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, H. NO. 40-37, L3-4, BELLARI ROAD, KURNOOL TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT, 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, III TOWN POLICE STATION, KURNOOL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. K RAMA SESHANNA, S/O K.PAPANNA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O H. O 69-557, KURUVA STREET, JOHANAPURAM, KURNOOL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. K PAKEERANNA, S/O K. PAPANNA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, OCCCULTIVATION, R/O H. NO 6. K MEGHANATH, S/O K. PAPANNA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, RESIDING AT H. NO. 69-558, KURUVA STREET, JOHANAPURAM, KURNOOL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ, order or direction preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd and 3rd respondent in not registering the FIR in pursuance to the complaint 2 given by the petitioner dt 5-8-2019 as unfair, unjust and unreasonable and violative of article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India, consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register the FIR pursuant to the complaint dated 05-08-2019 as being illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondent to register my complaint and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No. 1 to 3 to forthwith consider the complaint dated 05-08-2019 and register the FIR pending disposal of the Writ Petition in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V NITESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.12285 of 2019 ORDER: Sri Shaik Omer Qaiyum, learned counsel representing Sri V. Nitesh, learned counsel for the petitioners, submitted that no further orders are required in the writ petition at this stage. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, representing respondent Nos.1 to 3, is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is closed at the stage of admission without going into the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 12th February, 2026 cbn 4 36 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 12285 OF 2019 12th February, 2026 cbn